Author: Lakewood News from Karen

Updated to show questions, 25 Jan 2024

The homeless and migrant situation is an ongoing concern for everyone. People want to help but disagree on what that help looks like. From tough love to complete care, what do you think?

Let’s start the discussion at the beginning by answering a few basic questions. What would you like to see and how would you vote with your wallet?

Please take the survey below and we will share the results next week.

https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/7687498/What-is-Your-homeless-policy

Image of thank you page from survey

Thank you for your time. Any suggestions for future surveys are welcome by email!


Fixing the bridge lights for RTD on the 6th Avenue overpass is an $800,000 budget item for Lakewood… to fix RTD property. The large line item caught the attention of Council Member Olver at the time. How did this get to be in the budget with no prior public discussion?

Why isn’t RTD paying for their own repairs?

A series of open-records requests reveal not a single communication in 2023 between RTD and any city official discussing the details of how the project came to be. Not who would pay or for what, not what they think the problem is, or why RTD cannot pay for it…. Nothing.

As seen in the highlighted screenshot below, open-records requests revealed an email between the RTD point of contact and Council Member Shahrezaei. Shahrezaei responded that she would speak over the phone. Phone conversations increase communication but cannot be provided through open records requests.

Email from RTD representative asking Counselor Shahrezaei how to proceed. Shahrezaei responds she will call.

As the Council representative to DRCOG, Councilor Shahrezaei is in frequent contact with regional boards like RTD.

The city shared that this project was submitted to the budget by the Public Works Department during the 2024 budget process. No communications came up between staff and RTD on this topic but the city says they have been in discussion about the project for years.


No Council Discussion but Presumed Permission

According to the city, this budget item aligns with City Council Goal 3, “Beautiful and Sustainable City.” Normally, setting goals is admirable but this statement reveals the public policy disparity with the City Council setting goals.

  1. Council sets goals that could apply to many applications
  2. Council is not allowed to direct staff so technically no Council Member can say “please do this project to fulfill this goal”
  3. Council can claim credit for staff achieving specific goals even when there has been no apparent public decision. (For example, the Navigation Center was not a specific goal)
  4. Throughout the year, staff can justify many new projects without public discussion thereby leading to conspiracy theories about Point #2. (Can you find RTD lights under the stated goals?)

Public and City Choose Different Bridges

These bridge lights will be beautiful – if they can stay lit. Unsubstantiated sources suggest that the lights cannot remain functional through the train vibrations that displace electrical wiring.

In the bigger picture, there was public outcry in 2023 for a different bridge. Public wanted to keep the use of a pedestrian bridge in Ravines Open Space park. 290 residents signed a petition to keep a bridge that will now be lost. For the price of the lights that are RTD property, the city could have kept the city beautiful a different way. Now those park users will have an unusable pipe-hanger while RTD gets bridge lights that will, certainly, be enjoyed by all.

Picture of existing bridge compared to possible trestle design replacement with no walkable surface

Footnote: then-Counselor Janssen did not receive any answers to her questions before Council voted to approve this budget.


Correction to https://lakewoodinformer.com/2023/12/29/lakewood-to-propose-a-homeless-shelter-in-public-school-building/

An unnamed, closed Jefferson County school may act as a new location for the Jeffco Action Center rather than as a shelter. The Action Center offers hardship services and is valuable resource for many unhoused. The move would also increase housing for the homeless. Plans are not final, but discussions have been started. More details have not been brought before Council yet.

Per City Manager Hodgson, December 18 City Council meeting, “We recently worked with RecoveryWorks… and opened the first phase of the Navigation Center. Now we are talking about a partnership with the Action Center to move them [Action Center – not Navigation Center] to one of the schools that’s been closed…. then Lakewood would have a presence in the existing two buildings of the Action Center to complete the navigation concept and allow to for more housing for our homeless population….”


Despite cities across America seeking to reduce the flow of migrants, Lakewood is moving ahead to officially welcome more. On January 8, 2024, Lakewood City Council voted unanimously to move as quickly as possible to figure out how to help with Denver migrants (Note: Councilor Olver absent). A separate motion was passed for a study session on increasing service of the extreme weather shelter for the homeless, acknowledging that this will serve the migrant community as well.

Unless the recommended actions impact the municipal code, further actions could be taken as soon as February 12. For example, mention was made of Lakewood being a “good neighbor”. Denver is seeking to make “good neighbor” agreements with surrounding cities to agree to take their migrant population. Lakewood’s former Mayor, Adam Paul, plays a key role in these agreements with Denver.

These are unusually speedy decisions for Lakewood City Council. Generally, Council Requests for Legislative Action generate discussion and get deferred to another committee. It’s rare to have to direct action scheduled at all, let alone so quickly. Residents supporting Save Belmar Park have been asking City Council to take action for months with no results. One City Council Legislative Request was denied by the Council majority because no action was possible until new objectives were set at the annual retreat. In this case, the Council has not set ANY objectives for the year and it already has major policy decisions scheduled to be made in the February 12 meeting. The quick passage shows Council can act, direct staff, and schedule study sessions, when it wants to.

As a result of these motions, the February 12 meeting will include a study session at 5:30 pm on increasing shelter options. During the Executive Report in regular meeting on the same night, Lakewood City Manager Hodgson will relate what immediate actions can be taken to help migrants, and what actions may need further study.

Council Members expressed their belief that the majority of Lakewood residents would support both of these measures. Councilor Mayott-Guerrero said she believes “…progress is possible now in a way that it wasn’t even three years ago.”

Lakewood city staff report they can find no proclamation that Lakewood is a sanctuary city. However, Jefferson County is a sanctuary, so an official offer to help or house people, would increase the migrant population, as seen in other cities like Denver.


Crime, Homeless, Migrants

Do you feel like we are losing Lakewood? Have you tried talking to City Council but don’t feel heard? Are you concerned about these issues:

  • Crime on the rise
  • A potential, additional, new homeless shelter in a school
  • Recommendations to ease migrant fears
  • Development that IS NOT seamlessly integrated

Come discuss the issues with your neighbors and share your thoughts

  • Work together to effectively communicate
  • Plan long-term goals for what you would like for Lakewood
  • Start building a better community presence

Reserve your spot: email [email protected]

or first come first serve

The development near Belmar Park, on 777 S Yarrow, has brought into focus the “fee in lieu” provision of Lakewood, Colorado’s Municipal Code L.M.C. 14.16.010. These fees have not been reviewed, or changed, since 2018, resulting in potential under-compensation to the city. Historically developers have had to provide park land for their residents to use. The fee was instead of park land. Existing Lakewood parks would provide park services for the new development.

In light of the confusion regarding the fee in lieu of land dedication/policy the following was sent out to Council and staff on Dec. 31, 2023: 

Begin forwarded message:

From: Lenore Herskovitz <[email protected]>
Date: December 31, 2023 at 2:56:12 PM MST
To: Wendi Strom <[email protected]>, [email protected], Kathy Hodgson <[email protected]>, Travis Parker <[email protected]>, [email protected][email protected]
Subject: Fwd: land dedication fee in lieu

“I don’t know if you’ve seen this before but this is the fee that was set by Director of Community Resources in 2018. The fee is determined by the Director. The ordinance was supposed to have been reviewed by Council no later than Dec. 31, 2023. Also, the fee is due at the time of site plan approval or can be delayed by the Director (Kit Newland) until building permit issuance. The amount to be paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of payment (although it is interesting to note that the fee mentioned in the document expired on Dec. 31, 2019). As far as I know, the fee has not yet been paid. There has been misinformation sent out by the planning department stating “the city staff cannot change this valuation without an act of Council”. However, 14.16.07B of the 2018 document says that the Director shall set the fee equal to fair market value…The only job of Council right now is to review this ordinance. Why was this not placed on the agenda months ago? Staff should have been well aware that this needed to be addressed before the end of the year and it should have been posted. Former Councilor Springsteen mentioned this in October and no action was taken. Why are we updating fees so rarely? Prior to 2018, the only ordinance addressing this was passed in 1983. Obviously, property values fluctuate greatly and fair market values should reflect that. How much potential revenue have we lost over the years due to this antiquated system of determining fees? Council should review this ordinance at the next scheduled meeting and alter the terms as needed.”


See ordinance and policy letter below:

One recommendation from Lakewood’s Strategic Housing Plan (SHP) is to incentivize development with city funds. A variety of costs and methods are discussed. Specific spending decisions have not been made but City Manager Hodgson says staff is ready with a proposal to work with  the Community First Foundation  in a donor-advised fund. Funds could be ready as early as first quarter 2024. Hodgson suggested a starting amount of $500,000.

In most cases, direct funding would not be economical so available funds could be used to leverage other funds. For example, city funds could match against other government grants for development.

There are significant other costs proposed:

  • Increased staff costs
  • Increased administrative costs
  • Rebating city property taxes
  • Waiving permit costs
  • Paying for property damage
  • Increasing city funds for direct housing vouchers
  • Utilizing resident TABOR refunds
  • Non-direct costs such as impacts of loosened parking requirements

The other favored source of proposed funding would be from an increase to the Accommodation Tax (currently 3%). This hidden tax increase would have far-reaching effects:

  • Proposed changes would almost double the tax
  • Increased taxing makes it less economical for hotels, so would therefore decreases hotel viability. Hotels drive other tourism-based businesses.
  • Increased hotel fees make Short-Term Rentals (STRs) more attractive since they are immune to the tax.
  • Increased STRs contributes to needing more housing which will need more financial housing incentives while driving down the business that is providing the funding.

The reason for the accommodation tax in the first place was to fuel economic development but that purpose has been modified for public safety by Lakewood City Council.

The city has previously made funds available through the Community Block Grant Fund to pay for infrastructure costs for development. One benefit of having a new fund with the Community First Foundation would be that funds would be immediately available on the developers’ schedule, rather than waiting until grant approval time.

The indirect costs of increased residential services and decreased business opportunities cannot be directly calculated so are not considered.


Guest post from Alex Plotkin

recent article by RMPBS calls out the effects of the failed policies of the Colorado local and state politicians, but it incorrectly singles out the cause of the issue.  It’s not just the affordable housing, but a whole slew of factors which have set up some of the Colorado communities for the failures that are starting to manifest.  As is often the case, the local and state politicians are behind the curve on seeing the true cause of the problem, which they, in part might have created due to their short-sighted (and, in some cases, dubious) policies.

Instead of creating zoning and building standards which would have dictated the build out of diverse communities where localized, well-paying employment opportunities would be collocated with a variety of housing and educational opportunities, public transit and amenities which would attract a variety of skilled professionals at various stages of life, a number of communities in Colorado will be passed over on the way to locales which are proactively working on setting up their communities for the challenges that are rapidly coming our way.

In Lakewood, specifically, the government has chosen to foster the build out of metro districts and rentals, focusing on the means of extracting profit from those who live there, instead of creating well-paying, localized employment opportunities for the high-skill professionals, who, instead have moved on to other areas for employment, resulting in large parts of Lakewood being economically stagnant.  This, in turn is already resulting in death spiral of fewer families, businesses struggling or closing and the schools having to be closed due to fewer children being in the area (see this article for more)

Lakewood is not unique in their failures – as pointed out in the RMPBS article, whole swaths of the state are now setup to tumble down the road of losing out on more and more skilled/educated workers, younger families and a stable base of employment to enable a healthy and diverse economy.

The problem is not just about the housing – it is a lot more complicated than that.  For one, more desirable locales usually result in higher cost of housing.  The question then becomes – how do you make housing more attainable?

One of the ways is to enable more economic opportunity which would enable higher wages for those trying to secure housing.  Furthermore, once a local economic engine is firing, that creates a positive knock-on effect, whereby the surplus tax revenue might be used to subsidize housing for those who are vital to the community (i.e. janitors, nurses, teaches, etc.), but may not have the market-dictated wages to pay for the housing.

The RMPBS article points out that in Denver one now needs a $160,000 income to be able to semi-comfortably afford a home.  So, what are the local politicians in the aforementioned counties doing to bring in jobs which provide such income?

This is one of many areas in which Jefferson County in particular has been failing, miserably.  Their officials have been proactively rezoning properties originally slated for economic-and-education-oriented development in to residential (largely, rental and metro district to boot).  This not only destroys the economic potential, but also further stresses the county finances as residential units generally cost money to provide services to Colorado (as has been stated by Lakewood former city attorney and the documents provided by the developer for the Red Rocks Ranch).  Yet, over and over again, JeffCo officials have supported such rezoning and development, instead of figuring out a way to bring in higher paying, localized employment. (see this article for more)

The failures of the past are now leading to more failures in real time.  The federal government has recently announced that it will be providing billions of dollars to invest in high-tech development.

Yet, since JeffCo, at large has failed to champion any meaningful high-tech development to begin with, guess where those billions are not going to be invested?  Golden may catch some loose change, due to the School of Mines presence, but the rest of JeffCo (especially, Lakewood) – not likely.  Hence, in some parts of Colorado, one might argue, the economic death spiral is already in motion.

To add an insult to the injury, JeffCo has largely failed to champion a development of functional public transit.  To be fair, so has Colorado at large.  RTD is a massive failure, compared to even the relatively less well-off countries such as Czech Republic.  No, RTD is nowhere close to being a remotely good value for the dollars spent, if one actually looks at data.  Some politicians in Colorado love to drone on about data, yet, they frequently fail to look at metrics from world-renowned sources such as OECD and IPCC, instead falling back on the talking points fed to them by their campaign backers.

Otherwise, why would Colorado have such abysmal rates of public transit ridership?

We get ever more traffic, more pollution, and more and more cookie-cutter rentals, which were never meant for families to live in, a lot of which are owned by corporations, which may or may not have been engaging in collusion to set the rent prices and some of which are already embroiled in a lawsuit.

“RealPage’s clients include some of the largest property managers in the country. Many favor cities where rent has been rising rapidly, according to a ProPublica analysis of five of the country’s top 10 property managers as of 2020. All five use RealPage pricing software in at least some buildings, and together they control thousands of apartments in metro areas such as Denver, Nashville, Atlanta and Seattle, where rents for a typical two-bedroom apartment rose 30% or more between 2014 and 2019.”

Meanwhile, failing to creating conditions to drive the success of more people.  Not working on ways for those who would think of starting a family, to be able to do so without drowning financially.

And here is another thing to consider for those constantly claiming that work from home is a savior.  It’s not.

And those are just the short term effects to consider.  Longer term, it may get far worse:

“Artificial intelligence also is expected to eliminate some positions entirely. Mr. Krishna, of IBM, has said in recent weeks that he could see 30% of IBM’s roughly 26,000 non-customer-facing roles being replaced by automation or AI over a 5-year period.”

We are just starting to see the failures resulting from the shortsighted policies of last couple of decades.  Instead of engaging in truly open conversation with the public to see how the public should be helped to succeed in the even more adverse economic and environmental events to come, the local and state politicians are doubling down on enabling the last vestiges of profits for the big money interests at further detriment to the citizens at various socioeconomic levels.

Perhaps, sooner than later, a majority of the citizens will start to realize who put them in the dire straits they are in.  Some already are.

The next step would be for the citizens to realize that it is their elected officials who have enabled the types of development, for over a decade now, which have enabled the backsliding of thousands (or is it now millions?) of people in to becoming de-facto rent (and metro-district) financial serfs.  Instead of having more economic opportunities and more equitable conditions which may enable those wanting a family, to start one.

The Lures of Lakewood

Guest post from Joan from Lakewood

So the progressive Leadership of Lakewood maintained its position after the November 7 election. Congratulations Mayor Strom. But there is a crack in the smooth surface in Lakewood. An unknown politically naive man with no name recognition or political history came in second with 30 percent of the vote. This was dismissed by the winning party as an awful MAGA uprise and not to be considered. But I contend it is the symptom of the growing anger of the citizens of Lakewood over policies that have ignored public input (see the Save Belmar Park people)

But consider this, Arvada has recently rejected the monies from the county to open a negotiation center in the city. And is not developing policies and programs that will attract the unhoused into their community. Meanwhile Lakewood takes 7 million of Jefferson County funds (funds from the Federal Infrastructure Act) to open a recovery/navigation center

And makes itself more welcoming to unhoused individuals by opening and celebrating new programs. 

Editor’s note: It is unconfirmed if County/Federal money will be filtered through Lakewood or go directly to RecoveryWorks.

On November 29, there was a church/community meeting to roll out a “Safe to Park” program in the parking lot of Phillips United Methodist church at 1450 S Pierce St, This program will allow people living in their cars to have permission to park in 4 spaces on the church parking lot.  This program is designed to work with the services of Lakewood and there is an MOU that was referred to by the church leadership.(This is similar to a program operated by Lakewood United Methodist Church) My main concern was the cars (no RVs or trailers) are required to spend 4 nights a week in their parking spaces. But must leave between 8am to 6pm and there is no access to running water. Where will they go during the day? And When I asked where would these people would shower, the church leadership stated they are working out an arrangement with the Lakewood Link Recreation center. 

This policy was developed by a church homeless committee that passed its approval by a 4 to 3 vote. It is being put in place without a congregational vote. The reasoning is that the homeless are already here so we must do something. 

I think the most profound statement during this meeting was from a young father with two young children that stated that he was worried that this would lure more people to come into the neighborhood and park and sleep in their cars on public streets around Lasley Park. 

The next night, November 30, I attended an open house of the navigation center, located at 8000 West Colfax Avenue (Allison St and Colfax). This building is being developed in partnership with Recovery Works (a rent to own program) and will house 100 beds for those in need of housing. There were several government officials there and it was a general celebration of the opening of this the First Navigation Center in Lakewood. The mission would be supported by government services. There would be the DMV coming in once a month to help people get driver’s licenses. And medical services.  As well as job counseling.

But I came to realize that this was more than a celebration. It actually was a fundraiser for Recovery Works. There was a long speech of how great this is but it is going to take money.  Lots of money. And because the legislature in 2022 passed a bill (that allows 25 percent of private donations to homeless non profits to be used for a tax credit and one could donate up to $100,000 which would create a tax credit of $25,000 which could be used over a 5 year period. 

This explained the crowd of lawyers and retired members of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless. And the trays of Sushi. 

And when asked to vote on the new name for the Center with the West Colfax Community Navigation Center being one of the suggestions. I wrote on a sticky “The Lakewood Lure”

Nextdoor Posts About Crime

Guest post from Rocky Mountain

How many of us are concerned that about 80% of the posts on Nextdoor are about crime? Crimes that are committed against themselves, relatives, neighbors, etc. Most of these posts are about how to protect ourselves like installing lights, cameras, security systems or “call the cops”.

I’m sure many crimes have been prevented by these actions, but how many crimes have been solved and more importantly, what happened to the perpetrators? Did they receive appropriate punishment for their crime or are they simply given a slap on the wrist, made to promise not to do that again and put right back on the streets?

Our police force is underfunded and under staffed. They are restricted from performing their duties to arrest and detain criminals. And really, why bother anyway, they will just be let go anyway

Many of these crimes are not just about lost or damaged property. My brother’s truck was stolen. He lost much more than his truck. He lost all of his tools and materials he needed to make a living! They really have stolen the livelihood of himself and his entire family! What should the adequate punishment be for the scumbags that ruined the lives of an honest hard-working family? We are more concerned about the proper treatment of the criminals than their victims!

Shame on us! Who is to blame? Look in the mirror. 



I am 79 years old and have seen my nation, my city and my neighborhood steadily deteriorating.  We used to have a relatively safe and crime free community. For the most part, we were honest, respectful and God-fearing people. We didn’t have to worry about locking our homes, cars etc. I could ride my bike anywhere and leave it without fear of it being stolen.

We were taught certain values that are rapidly disappearing today. One of the most important one to me was, ‘If you don’t work, you don’t eat’. I went without supper a few times, but I learned that value pretty quick. Another one that I learned when I was quite young was the responsibility of safely owning and using firearms.

Of course, crimes were committed, but there were repercussions for them. Criminals were quickly and adequately punished for their crimes.

It sickens me to see crime running rampant. Seeing people so afraid. Afraid of just walking alone even from a parking lot to a store. People feeling that they must carry a defensive device of some kind just in case. People that feel they must live in a fortress with security systems to be relatively safe. Seeing criminals running free without conscience or fear of capture. People who don’t have much hope that ‘calling the cops’ will result in solving the problem. Police being restrained from doing their job. People that care more about the criminal than the victim. The result has changed from, ‘Crime doesn’t pay’ to ‘Crime does pay’.

I don’t think that many people who use Nextdoor realize how devastating many of these crimes are to the victims.

We are not even a nation anymore because a ‘nation that doesn’t control its borders is not a nation’.

Lakewood Informer


Resident generated news for Lakewood, Colorado.

Contact Info


Subscribe


© 2022 Lakewood Informer | All Rights Reserved
Designed by Mile High Web Designs